[ad_1]
David Sadan appeared freely before the Beauvais criminal court this Thursday, January 16 for aggravated theft with violence on a police officer Renault garage in Bornel on January 22, 2022.
Following the facts, David Sadan was the subject of a search warrant. During an ordinary traffic control in August 2024, shortly after his release from prison on August 7, 2024, he presented himself under the identity of a relative who could lead to criminal proceedings against him. Known by the courts, and after verification in the files, David Sadan was recognized and placed in police custody on August 18, 2024. During his hearing, the suspect denied any involvement in this theft despite the irrefutable evidence provided following the investigation. .
On the day of the events, while the offense of van theft broken at the back door is in progress, a police patrol arrives on site, three minutes after the call. They saw a vehicle on a road behind the building with 2 individuals inside. A third, who turns out to be David Sadan, throws his cigarette butt and gets back into the driver’s seat of the vehicle to restart.
A police officer stuck in the moving vehicle
Seeing a gendarme approaching them, the driver starts again. The soldier then enters the vehicle through the rear door to try to stop the criminals. Finding himself stuck in the passenger compartment, he received a punch from the front passenger to extract him from the vehicle, which earned him one day of ITT. But while the vehicle continues to move, the policeman will find himself with his head out of the passenger compartment, at the risk of much more serious injuries. Photos were posted on YouTube.
Identified and recognized by the gendarmes by his numerous background thanks to the video surveillance camerasTHE biological tests made on the cigarette butt that we see him smoking on the videos before getting back behind the wheel which revealed his DNAas well as the telephone records demonstrating his presence on the scene during the events, despite everything, the suspect continues to completely deny his involvement in this attempted theft during his hearing on August 24, 2024, i.e. just after his release on July 8, 2024 after two years of detention in Aix en Provence far from his family.
The suspect denies outright
Learning that her son had been checked at Bornel on January 22, 2022 following this attempted theft, David Sadan persists indicating that he does not remember this attempted theft nor having been aware of the control of his son. When the gendarmes tell him about his DNA found on the cigarette butt and the telephone records, despite everything, the suspect still finds answers to clear himself: “I was 20 meters away, (Editor’s note: in a Travelers camp near the Renault garage), I have brothers and sisters who smoke too.”
Heard on February 1, 2022, his accomplice immediately admitted his participation without revealing the identity of the two other individuals. The 3rd, son of David Sadan, did not recognize the facts and maintains that his father was absent on D-day.
Change of heart at the hearing
In court, the defendant changes his posture by recognizing his guilt and explains this turnaround: “I panicked for fear of going back to prison.” The men were allegedly commissioned to steal two vans.
His son aged 14-15 at the time was released: “He didn’t know that I was going to commit the acts. He is traumatized. he talks to me about it often. I tell him I did anything.”
As for the violence against the gendarme: “He jumped into the vehicle to remove the keys as I tried to start, panicking. Everything happened very quickly, I didn’t think.”
Heavy penal course
It must be said that the defendant has a long criminal record behind him in view of the 18 mentions in his criminal record, a 19th following this hearing, for similar facts of aggravated theft, criminal conspiracy, violence, carrying a weapon without authorization, receiving stolen property organized…
A heavy penal journey which he explains by “bad times, alcohol and cannabis…” which he says he no longer consumes, following a difficult life journey: the loss of his mother and loved ones…”And when a difficulty arises, do you relapse?” asks the court in confusion.
“The last sentence, which is the heaviest, gave me time to think. It served as a lesson to me. Since September, I have been relaunching my own business. I’m just starting to earn an income. I went through withdrawal in detention. Now I’m sorted: work, house, children.” says the defendant on the stand.
Risk of recurrence
For the Public Prosecutor’s Office, the irrefutable facts are recognized. But despite his record for similar acts, which earned him a long stay in prison with a short release without support, Mr. continues. Given these elements, faced with the risk of recurrence, “A framing” is essential according to the Public Ministry which requires 14 months including 6 months of probationary suspension with obligation to work and training for the acts of aggravated theft and violence to which are added two months with a referral to the sentence enforcement judge.
The lawyer of defense insists on the “sincerity of the speech” of his client who was able to take advantage of his long stay in prison far from his family, leaving his wife at home with 7 dependent children in great difficulty, to begin a positive dynamic with a stable family anchor. The fact that his son was prosecuted had an impact on him as a father, adds the lawyer.
“He did not flee during the two-year search warrant” And “appears before you today without shying away from his responsibilities” specifies the lawyer. Aware of the heavy criminal recordfor ancient factsthe defense argues in favor of a sentence of 10 months, subject to change, accompanied by a probationary suspension. “If it is possible to compensate the victims (editor’s note: absent from the hearing)it will be done” adds the defendant.
The court sentences him to 12 months including 6 months suspended for 2 years accompanied by an obligation to work and/or train (already undertaken) to which are added 2 months in prison for the involvement of the minor with the express agreement of his partner who attends the hearing, or 8 months in prison.
[ad_2]
Source link
