On June 20, 2023, Stive Robert, 43, was found guilty of sending threats to his partner for several years. The court prohibited him from entering into a relationship with the victim except for the exercise of parental authority over his son. What went wrong, but according to him it’s not his fault, it’s her who hangs around to respond to his messages or doesn’t respond to them at all.
The forty-year-old is therefore back before the Beauvais court (Oise), in immediate appearance, this Monday, December 16. The president read one of the messages he sent upon discovering damage to his mailbox: “I’m not a faggot who’s going to go see the police. It’s going to go far, whoever did this is going to put a ticket in it to repair it… I’m going to hire a team of Liancourtwe’re going to get you and your father… You’re going to go through hell, it’s going to go badly!»
He apologizes for “not very nice” messages
“And you wonder why she doesn’t answer you», asks the president. He acknowledges: “I made a mistake! I apologize to her for the not very nice messages I sent her“. So that this doesn’t happen again he is ready, from now on “to go to the gendarmerie and give up on her son who will suffer, but, if I were his mother, I would have invited his father so that he could see him blow out his birthday candles“.
The victim states that it is “complicated for her, that she is afraid, when it will happen“. She requests that he no longer have the right to contact her and €1,000 in damages for his moral injury.
The prosecution requests a mixed sentence
For the prosecutor, “the child is just a pretext to get in touch with his ex-partner: it’s just a question of pride. She dared to tell him no and he can’t stand it. He sends him messages without imagining the consequences on the person who receives this type of threat“. He is requesting a mixed sentence, the part of which will be suspended on probation including a ban on contact, appearing at home and having a relationship with his victim and a part of eight months in prison, with a committal warrant.
Stive Robert is defended by Domitille Risbourg who insists on the vagueness that exists in the ban on being in a relationship except for the exercise of parental authority which allows news of the living conditions of the ex through the child. “He has a permanent job and a home. A probationary suspension and above all no continued detention would be the best legal possibility”, according to her.
Stive Robert will spend four months in prison
Stive Robert was found guilty. He was sentenced to twelve months in prison, including four months in prison and with continued detention and eight months under probation with a ban on appearing at his ex’s home, entering into a relationship with her, and paying her €800 in compensation for moral damage, to receive treatment, and to work.
